“If something is important enough, even if the odds are against you, you should still do it.”
– Elon Musk
Monthly Archives: May 2016
The Markets This Week
Stocks fell last week on concerns about U.S. retailing, commodity-price weakness, credit data in China, and a stronger dollar. The last hurt large-capitalization stocks, costing the Dow Jones Industrial Average 1.2%.
Investors were perplexed when the Commerce Department said Friday that April retail sales had jumped 1.3%, right after several big department-store operators had reported poor first-quarter numbers. Separately, consumer sentiment in early May improved sharply, data showed.
Macy’s (ticker: M), Kohl’s (KSS), and J.C. Penney (JCP) all reported much lower first-quarter sales last week, and offered generally unappetizing guidance. The department-stores group slumped 16%, with Macy’s down 17%, to $31.21.
The greenback, which has been soft this year, began to move up again in May. That hurt shares of big companies, which tend to have substantial overseas sales. The Dow industrials lost 205 points on the week, to 17,535.32. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell 10.5 points to 2046.61, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.4% to finish at 4717.68.
The retail data seem to point up a shift in consumer dollars from malls to online spending, says Brian Lazorishak, a portfolio manager with Stack Financial Management in Whitefish, Mont. While some investors took solace from the surprisingly positive government figures, bears noted the numbers measured the past, while the downbeat guidance from department stores was forward-looking.
Chinese steel futures fell more than 10% last week and are down about 25% from a peak in April, and there are signs the selloff is spreading to other global markets and other commodities. Additionally, Chinese credit data showed a sharper drop than expected in April in most lending categories.
The market has been trading in a range around 2100 for a while, and “looks as if it is struggling for additional multiple expansion” to push up the indexes, says John Brady, a sales trader at R.J. O’Brien. He sees the market moving sideways short-term, with the Federal Reserve ever ready to prop it up with dovish talk about rate-hike expectations.
Lazorishak says there is enough technical strength to give the rally the benefit of the doubt, but it looks like it is running out of steam just as the market enters a traditionally weak season.
(Source: Barrons Online)
Heads Up!
The 2014 – 2016 collapse in domestic oil prices and related investment spending has proved to be far greater in scale and duration than what had occurred in prior cycles. History shows that sharp and large declines in energy prices tend to result in a substantial deceleration in nominal GDP growth, which also impacts both investment and consumption channels. With most of the negative effects of the oil-price collapse already absorbed, the cash flow benefit to households, transportation companies and a wide swath of industrial companies is yet to be realized.
If we assume no further substantial drops in domestic oil prices and capital spending plans, then the vast majority of the negative effects have probably already been absorbed. It’s the beneficial effects of lower oil prices that have yet to be fully realized. As a result, we believe nominal GDP growth should accelerate through the end of 2016. Source, in part: AB Global.
The “Heat Map”
Most of the time, the U.S. stock market looks to 3 factors (call them the “pillars” which support the stock market) to support its upward trend – let’s grade each of the pillars.
CONSUMER SPENDING: This grade is A- (very favorable).
THE FED AND ITS POLICIES: This factor is rated B (favorable). The U.S. economy can handle higher rates as long as the pace of future interest rate increases is slow. Fed Chair Janet Yellen made clear in her press conference after the December meeting that the path higher would be “gradual”.
The Fed’s plan to gradually raise rates in the coming years won’t derail the economy and brings some certainty to the market, says Morningstar’s Bob Johnson.
BUSINESS PROFITABILITY: This factor’s grade is a C- (below average). So far, first quarter corporate-earnings reports weren’t as bad as anticipated but certainly nothing to write home about. With first-quarter results in from 87% of the companies in the S&P 500, the earnings decline is expected to be 7.1%, according to FactSet.
OTHER CONCERNS: The “Heat Map” is indicating the U.S. stock market is in OK shape ASSUMING no international crisis. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the highest level of crisis, we rate these international risks collectively as a 4. While decreased, these risks still deserve our ongoing attention.
The Numbers
Last week, Bonds increased and U.S. Stocks and Foreign Stocks declined. During the last 12 months, BONDS outperformed STOCKS.
Returns through 5-6-2016 |
1-week |
Y-T-D |
1-Year |
3-Years |
5-Years |
10-Years |
Bonds- BarCap Aggregate Index |
.2 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
2.5 |
3.5 |
5.0 |
US Stocks-Standard & Poor’s 500 |
-.3 |
1.4 |
1.0 |
10.7 |
11.3 |
6.7 |
Foreign Stocks- MS EAFE Developed Countries |
-3.0 |
-3.3 |
-11.8 |
.6 |
1.5 |
1.0 |
Source: Morningstar Workstation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be invested into directly. Three, five and ten year returns are annualized excluding dividends.
“Your Financial Choices”
The show airs on WDIY Wednesday evenings, from 6-7 p.m. The show is hosted by Valley National’s Laurie Siebert CPA, CFP®, AEP®. This week Laurie will discuss: “Financial Planning Considerations for Women”
Laurie will take your calls on these topics and other inquiries this week. Questions may be submitted early through www.yourfinancialchoices.com by clicking Contact Laurie. This show will be broadcast at the regular time. WDIY is broadcast on FM 88.1 for reception in most of the Lehigh Valley; and, it is broadcast on FM 93.9 in the Easton and Phillipsburg area– or listen to it online from anywhere on the internet. For more information, including how to listen to the show online, check the show’s website www.yourfinancialchoices.com and visit www.wdiy.org.
Motivational Quote of the Week
“If you can dream it, you can achieve it.” – Zig Ziglar
The Markets This Week
Stocks fell last week in response to underwhelming quarterly earnings reports and disappointing economic data from the U.S. and China. Large-capitalization stocks outperformed small-caps. Fears about slowing global growth clipped cyclical stocks in sectors such as energy, mining, and industrials, which had led the market since the Feb. 11 low.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average eased 33 points on the week, to 17,740.63. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index fell 8 to 2057.14. The Nasdaq gave up 0.8% to finish at 4736.16.
The Labor Department said Friday that nonfarm payrolls rose 160,000 last month, below expectations of 205,000 additions and the lowest number of jobs added in seven months. The unemployment rate was unchanged at 5%. Wages rose a strong 2.5%. Separately, Labor said U.S. first-quarter productivity, or output per worker, declined 1%.
Robert Pavlik, chief market strategist at Boston Private Wealth, says the primary cause of market weakness was a drop in April manufacturing numbers, both in the U.S. and China, released at the beginning of the week. Continued softness in the U.S. dollar had been helping cyclicals, many with sales generated overseas. But “all of a sudden,” he says, the falling dollar was taken by some investors as a sign of U.S. economic malaise.
The data showed three things, none of which are good for cyclicals, says Jim Tierney, portfolio manager at AllianceBernstein: “The U.S. economy is pretty darn sluggish; wage inflation is creeping higher; and productivity is terrible.”
The deterioration in first-quarter earnings—and not just among energy companies—was also a factor, says William Nichols, a managing director at Cantor Fitzgerald. Companies are beating earnings expectations that had been lowered, but the top line remains challenged, he adds.
Many companies are topping earnings-per-share expectations, but the percentage of those beating revenue estimates is 53%, below the five-year quarterly average.
Now that the reporting season is just about done, investors will turn their focus to the June 15-16 Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Although a rate hike isn’t expected, they’ll be parsing Fed officials’ commentary before then. The market could tread water ahead of the meeting.
(Source: Barrons Online)
Heads Up!
The Gross Domestic Product (“GDP”) economic report has been released for the first quarter 2016. It shows a meager .5% increase. But, we do not put much faith in its accuracy. The Bureau of Economic Analysis, according to the Wall Street Journal, uses a flawed calculation for the seasonal adjustment. The Bureau could make an adjustment but it has chosen not to thus far.
Given the math of seasonal adjustments, the first quarter growth is being understated and the three remaining quarters understated.
The take-away is to keep in mind the economy is stronger than it seems in the economic reports.
The “Heat Map”
Most of the time, the U.S. stock market looks to 3 factors (call them the “pillars” which support the stock market) to support its upward trend – let’s grade each of the pillars.
CONSUMER SPENDING: This grade is A- (very favorable).
THE FED AND ITS POLICIES: This factor is rated B (favorable). The U.S. economy can handle higher rates as long as the pace of future interest rate increases is slow. Fed Chair Janet Yellen made clear in her press conference after the December meeting that the path higher would be “gradual”.
The Fed’s plan to gradually raise rates in the coming years won’t derail the economy and brings some certainty to the market, says Morningstar’s Bob Johnson.
BUSINESS PROFITABILITY: This factor’s grade is a C- (below average). So far, first quarter corporate-earnings reports weren’t as bad as anticipated but certainly nothing to write home about.
OTHER CONCERNS: The “Heat Map” is indicating the U.S. stock market is in OK shape ASSUMING no international crisis. On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the highest level of crisis, we rate these international risks collectively as a 4. While decreased, these risks still deserve our ongoing attention.